The Hidden Cost of Beauty: Unpacking Pollution from Tanzania's Cosmetic Industry

Let’s get serious for a minute, behind all the sheen and glamour, the cosmetics industry is carrying some real environmental baggage. We’re looking at around 120 billion units of packaging churned out every year, most of which isn’t recyclable. That’s a massive hit to the global plastic waste pile, and it’s not going anywhere soon. On top of that, the industry’s dependence on fossil fuel-based ingredients and packaging isn’t just bad optics, it’s a major driver of air pollution, with a steady stream of VOCs and CO2 emissions heading straight into the atmosphere.

It doesn’t end there. The scramble for “natural” ingredients is ramping up deforestation, while heavy pesticide and fertilizer use is polluting soil and water supplies. Step back and look at the big picture: beauty and personal care brands are responsible for about 0.5% of global carbon emissions, nearly a billion metric tons of CO2 every year. That’s not a number you can just ignore.

Now, let’s drill down to Tanzania. The country’s cosmetics manufacturing sector has been on an upward trajectory, fueled by growing demand, increased urbanization, and higher disposable incomes. Projections show the local market expanding at close to 4% a year through 2028, with imports expected to hit $113 million by 2026. While this spells opportunity, it also means heightened pressure on Tanzania’s environment. The surge in consumption, coupled with infrastructure and regulatory frameworks that may not be fully robust, raises the risk of outsized environmental impacts. In other words, unchecked growth could quickly outpace the country’s ability to manage pollution and waste.

Bottom line: the global cosmetics sector’s environmental impact is undeniable, but the stakes are even higher for emerging markets like Tanzania. Sustainable, locally relevant solutions aren’t just a nice-to-have they’re a business imperative for long-term growth and reputation management. If the industry wants to keep its shine, it needs to take these challenges seriously and act accordingly.

The Many Faces of Cosmetic Pollution

The environmental impact of the cosmetic industry is multifaceted, extending across various forms of pollution that affect land, water, and air.

Plastic Predicament: Packaging, Microplastics, and Beyond

The beauty industry’s dependence on plastic is staggering. Think about it, everything from mascara wands to shampoo bottles comes wrapped or contained in plastic. Industry numbers hit around 120 billion plastic packaging units a year. That’s not a typo. A significant chunk of this packaging isn’t even recyclable. Most of it ends up in landfills or, worse, our oceans, where it breaks down into microplastics, the kind you can’t see but definitely don’t want in your food chain or water supply.

Let’s talk about the plastics themselves. Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) and styrene-acrylonitrile (SAN) are a nightmare from a recycling standpoint, most of it just gets dumped. Even plastics that are supposedly more versatile, like PET and PP, aren’t easy to recover. And PVC? That one’s notorious for its environmental risks, mainly due to its chlorine content. The kicker is, cosmetic packaging rarely uses just one material. Mixed materials make recycling nearly impossible, leading to even higher rates of waste.

Microplastics are an escalating concern for the industry. Sometimes they’re added on purpose, toothpaste, exfoliating scrubs, glitter, you name it (the so-called primary microplastics). More often, they’re a byproduct of larger plastics breaking down. These particles are too small to be filtered out by standard water treatment, so they end up in waterways and, ultimately, in the food chain. Studies are already linking microplastics to negative health impacts, from inflammation to potential DNA changes. This isn’t just a hypothetical threat, there’s already evidence of microplastics in Tanzanian lakes and coastal regions, traced back to both domestic and industrial sources.

At the end of the day, the industry’s reliance on low-cost, convenient plastic is fundamentally incompatible with environmental sustainability. The system is set up to externalize the environmental costs, companies get the profits, while society and the environment bear the risks. The widespread use of difficult-to-recycle plastics, plus the addition of microplastics to products, highlights a market failure. The bottom line: As long as producers aren’t held accountable for the full lifecycle of their packaging, the issue will persist, impacting ecosystems and consumers alike.

Chemical Conundrum: Toxic Ingredients and Manufacturing By-products

The beauty industry’s got a serious problem, and it’s not just about questionable marketing. Many products are loaded with hazardous substances, think VOCs in perfumes and hairsprays, which don’t just add scent but also ramp up carbon emissions and knock urban air quality down a few notches. Then there’s the heavy metal issue: lead, cadmium, copper, these turn up in cosmetics, especially lipstick, as studies in Dar es Salaam have shown. Not exactly what you want in your morning routine.

Let’s talk about chemicals like parabens, phthalates, and formaldehyde. They’re not just hard to pronouncethey’ve been tied to significant health and environmental risks, from ecological disruption to cancer. Even PEGs, used to help products soak into your skin, sometimes come contaminated with heavy metals and other toxins. Not a great look for an industry that promises to make people feel better about themselves.

On the operational side, manufacturing these products generates a substantial amount of chemical waste, expired ingredients, by-products, and hazardous leftovers. This waste requires specialized handling, yet in places like Tanzania, mismanagement means rivers like the Msimbazi in Dar es Salaam are taking the hit, with industrial effluent and heavy metals seeping into local ecosystems.

As for human impact, the risks aren’t theoretical. Consumers and workers are exposed to chemicals that cause everything from skin irritation and allergies to asthma, birth defects, and cancer. There’s a documented link between certain underarm cosmetics and breast cancer, for example, and factory workers face daily exposure to toxic fumes. Historically, regulatory oversight has been weak, which let products containing mercury or even rat poison slip onto the market, and some of these problems persist. According to reports, the average U.S. woman is exposed to over 160 chemicals daily via beauty products.

The regulatory landscape isn’t keeping pace. Imported cosmetics coming in from established markets like the UK, US, India, and China still test positive for heavy metals in Tanzania. Weak border controls, unregistered businesses, and a flood of counterfeit products only compound the problem. The industry’s global nature means that domestic regulation isn’t enough; international standards and cooperation are essential.

There’s also a major gender component here. Women are disproportionately exposed due to societal beauty pressures, which adds another layer of complexity to the issue. Additionally, the economic cost of dealing with substandard and unsafe products is a serious drain on developing economies like Tanzania.

Bottom line: the cosmetic sector’s chemical risks are both a public health and an environmental hazard. Addressing them will demand stronger domestic regulations, robust import controls, and coordinated international action, plus, a willingness to confront the societal drivers fueling high product demand. For businesses operating in this space, failing to adapt isn’t just a compliance risk, it’s a reputational and financial liability.

Water Woes: Consumption and Contamination

Water plays an absolutely central, if often overlooked, role in the cosmetics industry. Look at the ingredient labels on most beauty products and you’ll notice water takes up anywhere from 60% to 85% of the formula basically, it’s the backbone. But it’s not just inside the bottle; water use runs through the entire production cycle: cultivating raw ingredients, cooling and cleaning factory equipment, and even in the manufacturing of all that single-use plastic packaging. The scale is staggering, with billions of cubic meters consumed globally just for packaging alone.

The real challenge kicks in after the consumer is done with the product. When cosmetics are washed off, all those chemicals, surfactants, and microplastics head straight to wastewater treatment plants. Unfortunately, these facilities are frequently under-equipped to capture every contaminant, which means a significant share ends up in rivers and lakes. The Msimbazi River in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, is a cautionary tale, industrial and cosmetic runoff has left the water unsafe for any practical use, whether for households, agriculture, or even basic consumption.

There are regulations in place in Tanzania targeting wastewater discharge, including those specific to the cosmetics sector. Yet, enforcement remains a persistent issue. This leaves us with a two-part problem: excessive water usage by the industry, compounded by its role as a primary vector for pollution. In emerging markets and water-stressed regions like Tanzania, where infrastructure is often lacking, the impact is even more severe.

The growing movement toward “waterless beauty” products is a step in the right direction, but it alone won’t solve these systemic challenges. The industry must prioritize both reducing water consumption throughout production and investing in robust, enforceable wastewater treatment solutions. Without meaningful action on both fronts, the sector’s water footprint will remain unsustainable, putting public health, local ecosystems, and long-term business viability at risk. The situation at the Msimbazi River underscores the urgent need for comprehensive water management strategies that involve both industry innovation and stronger regulatory oversight.

Air Quality Concerns: VOCs and Emissions

Air quality concerns are becoming increasingly significant within the cosmetics sector. Many mainstream products, perfumes, deodorants, hair sprays, contain substantial levels of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs). These compounds don’t simply dissipate; they contribute to urban air pollution and amplify carbon emissions, which is a growing challenge for modern cities.

The environmental impact doesn’t end at product use. The entire lifecycle of cosmetic goods, especially packaging, is problematic. Much of the packaging is plastic, and the production process for that plastic is resource-intensive, drawing heavily on petroleum and generating substantial greenhouse gas emissions. The industry as a whole is responsible for approximately 0.5% of global carbon emissions, a non-trivial figure, especially as sustainability comes under increasing scrutiny.

Focusing on Tanzania, the issue is compounded by low recycling rates, hovering around 5-10%. Most cosmetic packaging waste ends up in landfills or is openly burned, leading to direct emissions of CO2, methane, ammonia, and other pollutants. Open burning, in particular, introduces toxic substances into the local atmosphere, creating immediate public health concerns and contributing to long-term climate change.

What’s especially notable is that the majority of this waste, around 75% according to recent audits, originates from local manufacturers. This highlights the significant role domestic production and waste management practices play in environmental outcomes.

To address these challenges, a comprehensive approach is required, one that looks beyond product formulation. Business leaders should focus on the entire supply chain, from sustainable packaging choices to robust waste management solutions. Prioritizing reduction, reuse, and proper disposal will be key in minimizing both local air quality issues and the broader climate impact associated with the cosmetics industry.

Table 1: Key Pollutants from the Cosmetic Industry and Their Environmental/Health Impacts

https://marisustainableskincare.my.canva.site/environmental-and-health-impacts-of-key-cosmetics-pollutants

Tanzania's Cosmetic Landscape: Growth, Challenges, and Local Context

Understanding the specific dynamics within Tanzania's cosmetic sector is crucial for addressing its environmental footprint.

Market Dynamics and Local Players

Tanzania’s cosmetics industry is clearly on an upward trajectory. Market projections anticipate steady growth, roughly 3.8% annually from 2024 through 2028. Consumer demand for beauty, makeup, and skincare products has shown consistent progress since 2012. This expansion is being fueled by rapid urbanization, increasing disposable income, and the influence of social media marketing and beauty influencers.

The country’s trade numbers are also significant. By 2026, cosmetic exports are forecasted to hit $130 million, while imports are projected around $113 million, with China, Germany, and the UK serving as primary suppliers. These figures show Tanzania is both a producer and a serious player in regional cosmetics trade.

Equally noteworthy is the emergence of local brands. Companies like Skya, Glamhour, Sultan Cosmetics, and ZuRii House Of Beauty are not just following global trends; they’re developing products for diverse skin types and aligning with local regulations. Some brands, like Tanga Pharmaceutical & Plastics Ltd have even invested in their own packaging production, which is a strategic move for cost control and supply chain flexibility.

But with growth comes complexity. The surge in both domestic production and imports creates significant regulatory challenges. Imported products, sometimes containing hazardous substances, pose risks to consumer safety and the environment. Local brands are working to meet standards, but gaps remain: unregistered businesses and substandard goods continue to circulate. The Tanzania Food and Drugs Authority is tightening import and export controls, but enforcement is an ongoing challenge.

The reality is that a robust pollution control strategy for Tanzania’s cosmetic sector must address both domestic manufacturing and the regulation of imported goods. Effective market oversight is essential, not just to maintain consumer trust, but also to ensure long-term, sustainable growth for the industry.

Traditional Ingredients and Modern Pollution

Tanzania stands out for its deep-rooted tradition of natural beauty practices, built on the use of locally sourced ingredients. Shea butter and moringa oil have been staples for nourishment and radiance, while ugali is even used for exfoliation. Aloe vera supports skin repair, turmeric is favored for brightening, and baobab oil is renowned for anti-aging benefits. Coconut oil remains a go-to for hair care, neem leaves are trusted for tackling acne, and hibiscus infusions are valued for toning. These ingredients have earned their reputation based on proven effectiveness and authenticity.

Yet, the current trend toward modern, large-scale cosmetic production, even when it includes natural components, raises significant sustainability concerns. Industrial-level demand for oils like moringa or baobab often drives aggressive cultivation, which can result in deforestation, habitat loss, and increased pesticide and fertilizer use. These practices not only degrade the environment but also diminish the credibility of “eco-friendly” claims. Moreover, the growing inclusion of synthetic substances in cosmetics introduces additional environmental and health hazards, moving the industry further away from true sustainability.

The surging popularity of “natural” or “organic” cosmetics, while a positive sign in theory, can actually backfire if supply chains and sourcing aren’t carefully managed. Mass cultivation of natural ingredients for industrial use can directly contradict the values these products claim to uphold. This opens the door to greenwashing, where brands may exaggerate or mislead consumers about their environmental commitment, ultimately undermining trust and genuine sustainability efforts. Additionally, research suggests that sourcing and production shortcuts, often taken to reduce costs or respond to local market pressures, can compromise product safety and ethical standards.

In summary, achieving true sustainability in the cosmetics sector requires far more than a switch to natural ingredients. Companies must commit to responsible agricultural practices, transparent supply chains, and ethical sourcing to ensure their products deliver real environmental benefits and maintain consumer trust. Anything less risks not only damaging the environment but also eroding the integrity of the entire industry.

The Burden of Waste: A National Challenge

Here’s the deal: Tanzania is staring down a serious plastic waste management headache. The numbers don’t lie, back in 2018, the country produced about 315,000 tonnes of plastic waste. Sure, the average Tanzanian tosses out just 5.6 kg of plastic a year, which is way below the global average. But the collection rate? Only 34%. The rest an alarming 66% ends up mismanaged, leaking into rivers, lakes, and eventually the ocean. In 2018 alone, 29,000 tonnes made it into water bodies. To put it in perspective, plastic accounts for roughly 12% of all the solid waste generated in the country.

The infrastructure? Honestly, it’s lagging. There’s a major gap in sanitary landfills and incineration facilities. Recycling is barely making a dent, less than 10% of recyclables like plastic bottles actually get recycled. Only seven municipalities across Tanzania have anything close to modern landfills. The result: waste piles up, and the system can’t keep up with the volume.

This isn’t just an environmental issue; it’s a business risk and a reputational challenge. Mismanaged plastic waste breaks down into microplastics, contaminates ecosystems, and threatens both biodiversity and the food chain. Plus, the production and disposal cycle feeds into greenhouse gas emissions, increasing the pressure from regulators and consumers alike. Globally, marine plastic pollution is on everyone’s radar, thanks to disasters like the Great Pacific Garbage Patch.

In terms of accountability, the data is clear: local manufacturers and producers are responsible for 75% of audited plastic waste, with foreign companies making up the remaining 25%. Leading contributors include major players such as MeTL, Bakhresa, U Fresh, Chemi & Cotex, Watercom, Unilever, Coca-Cola, Tanzania Distillers, SBC Tanzania, and Tanzania Breweries. These are household names, meaning the spotlight is very much on them.

For the cosmetics industry and other sectors, this isn’t a side note; it’s a core business issue. Weak collection and recycling rates, combined with a lack of formal disposal systems, mean that local companies are amplifying the crisis. The absence of strong Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) legislation in Tanzania only makes matters worse. Without a regulatory push, there’s little incentive for these businesses to invest in sustainable packaging or waste recovery. Instead, they externalize costs, passing the burden onto the public and the environment.

The takeaway? The onus is now on domestic industries to step up. Implementing robust, enforceable EPR frameworks isn’t just good PR, it’s becoming a business imperative. Companies need to take ownership of the full lifecycle of their products, from production to post-consumer waste. Relying on consumer behavior or patchy guidelines won’t cut it anymore. Those who adapt will build trust and resilience; those who don’t risk falling behind as the market and society demand real solutions.

Regulatory Framework and Enforcement in Tanzania

Tanzania has established a legal and institutional framework to govern cosmetic safety and environmental protection, yet its effectiveness in practice faces various challenges.

Policies and Legislation: A Patchwork of Control

The primary regulatory body for cosmetics in Tanzania is the Tanzania Food and Drugs Authority (TFDA), now known as the Tanzania Medicines and Medical Devices Authority (TMDA). Established under the Food, Drugs and Cosmetics Act of 2003, its core mandate is to ensure the safety, quality, and efficacy of cosmetics. The National Environment Management Council (NEMC) plays a crucial role in environmental enforcement, compliance, and monitoring , while the Tanzania Bureau of Standards (TBS) is responsible for setting and overseeing product standards.

The TFDA Act of 2003 includes comprehensive provisions regulating the manufacture, importation, distribution, and sale of cosmetics. It specifically addresses prohibited ingredients and the issue of counterfeit cosmetics. In a significant move, Tanzania banned three chemical ingredients, pyrithione zinc, butylphenyl methylpropional, and sodium hydroxymethylglycinate, from cosmetics, effective March 1, 2022, due to their established links to infertility and cancer.

In terms of plastic waste, Tanzania implemented a strict ban on single-use plastic bags in June 2019, aligning with global efforts to reduce plastic pollution. However, plastic ziplock bags used for storing toiletries are explicitly exempted, provided they remain in the traveler's possession and are not disposed of within Tanzania.

Regulations also cover waste and chemical disposal. The Environmental Management Act (CAP. 191) and its associated regulations govern general waste management. The TFDA has issued guidelines for the safe disposal of unfit medicines and cosmetic products. These guidelines aim to prevent the accumulation of such products and mitigate health risks from improper disposal, including preventing drinking water contamination, avoiding harm to sewage treatment bacteria, and preventing the release of toxic pollutants from burning. Hazardous wastes and their disposal are further regulated under the international Basel Convention.

Moreover, environmental impact assessments (ESIAs) are a mandated part of the regulatory landscape. The Zanzibar Environmental Management Act No. 3 of 2015 requires project developers to conduct an ESIA before project implementation. Similarly, the Environmental Management Act of 2004 also mandates ESIAs for certain projects, ensuring environmental considerations are integrated into development.

While Tanzania has established a foundational legal framework for cosmetic safety and waste management, including bans on certain chemicals and single-use plastics, the effectiveness of these regulations is undermined by specific loopholes and the inherent complexity of regulating a rapidly growing market that encompasses both local and imported products. The exemption for ziplock bags used for toiletries, for instance, allows a continuous influx of cosmetic-related plastic into the country, even if not intended for immediate disposal. The existence of detailed guidelines for the disposal of unfit products, developed due to a "lack of appropriate guidance" and "accumulation" of such items, suggests a gap between policy intent and actual practice. Furthermore, the detection of heavy metals in imported cosmetics despite import regulations points to challenges in controlling transboundary pollution. The involvement of multiple regulatory bodies, such as TFDA/TMDA, NEMC, and TBS, can lead to fragmented oversight and overlapping mandates, as noted in assessments of Tanzania's regulatory system. This creates a "patchwork" system where gaps can be exploited, leading to continued environmental degradation and health risks. The mere presence of regulations is insufficient; their comprehensiveness, consistency, and adaptability to market complexities, including global supply chains and consumer behavior, are critical for achieving genuine environmental protection.

Banned/Restricted Cosmetic Ingredients in Tanzania and Associated Risks

Read more about banned ingredients in Tanzania in my blog article: https://www.marissustainableskincare.com/banned-ingredients-in-tanzania

Enforcement Realities: Gaps and Progress

Despite the existing regulatory framework, Tanzania faces significant challenges in the effective monitoring and enforcement of cosmetic industry standards. A major obstacle is the widespread presence of unregistered businesses and the production of substandard or counterfeit products, which operate outside formal oversight. The regulatory process itself is often complex, involving numerous entities with potentially overlapping mandates, creating unnecessary administrative burdens for compliant firms. Historically, the regulation of the cosmetic industry was not given due importance, leading to the circulation of dangerous products. Even in more developed regulatory environments, like the US FDA, there are limitations, such as the inability to issue mandatory recalls for dangerous products, highlighting common weaknesses in regulatory authority. Furthermore, limited resources and technical capacity within regulatory bodies hinder their ability to effectively police the market.

Efforts are being made to control hazardous chemicals. The Tanzania Bureau of Standards (TBS) actively monitors both local manufacturers and imported products to ensure adherence to national standards. This includes rigorous testing of products in TBS laboratories before they are permitted to enter the local market. The government has also expressed its commitment to taking action against the rampant use of hazardous chemicals and promoting 'healthy cosmetics'.

However, a critical policy gap exists concerning Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR). Unlike countries such as Kenya, Tanzania currently lacks specific legislation governing EPR, relying instead on guidelines. This means that cosmetic producers are not legally mandated to take financial or operational responsibility for the entire lifecycle of their products, including post-consumer waste collection and recycling. This absence contributes significantly to the low recycling rates and pervasive mismanaged waste observed across the country.

The disconnect between existing policies and their effective enforcement in Tanzania represents a critical barrier to addressing cosmetic pollution. The absence of specific EPR legislation is a glaring policy gap that allows local manufacturers, identified as leading polluters, to externalize the costs of waste management onto the environment and public infrastructure. This perpetuates the cycle of pollution despite existing bans and guidelines. The reliance on voluntary guidelines rather than legally binding mandates means that dominant local players have less incentive to invest in costly sustainable packaging or comprehensive waste recovery systems. The challenges posed by unregistered businesses and substandard products further complicate enforcement efforts, as these entities often operate outside the formal regulatory net. To effectively curb pollution from the cosmetic industry in Tanzania, a fundamental shift is needed from voluntary guidelines to legally binding EPR legislation that holds manufacturers accountable for their product's entire lifecycle. This must be complemented by strengthened regulatory capacity and enhanced inter-agency coordination to address market complexities and combat illicit trade.

Towards a Greener Future: Sustainability Initiatives and Opportunities

Despite the challenges, there is a growing global movement towards sustainable beauty, presenting significant opportunities for Tanzania to transform its cosmetic industry.

Industry Innovations: Eco-friendly Practices

Globally, the cosmetic industry is witnessing a notable shift towards eco-friendly packaging solutions. This includes the exploration of recyclable materials such as glass, metal, and biodegradable plastics, alongside a growing trend towards refillable options. Companies like Lush exemplify this by using plant-based components and recycled paper for their product wraps, while Ethique offers solid shampoo bars in biodegradable cardboard packaging. Refillable systems are gaining traction, with examples like Dove's refillable deodorant and Proverb Skin's home-compostable sachets demonstrating practical applications.

Formulation changes are also a key area of innovation. There is a strong push for microplastic-free formulas, with some countries implementing bans on microplastics in cosmetics, prompting brands to adopt biodegradable alternatives. The concept of "waterless beauty" is also emerging as a significant trend aimed at combating water scarcity by reducing the water content in products.

Manufacturers are increasingly focusing on water conservation and waste reduction within their operations. This involves implementing techniques such as recycling and reusing water during production processes and developing product formulations that require less water overall. Efforts are also being made to reduce, reuse, and recycle waste throughout the product's lifecycle, including upcycling packaging materials and repurposing unused ingredients or manufacturing by-products.

Major global players are setting ambitious sustainability targets. Unilever, for instance, has committed to halving its virgin plastic use by 2025, incorporating 25% recycled plastic in its packaging, and collecting and processing more plastic than it sells. The company also aims for 100% of its plastic packaging to be designed for reusability, recyclability, or compostability by 2025. L'Oréal is similarly committed to making all its packaging rechargeable, refillable, recyclable, or compostable by 2025 , and is developing innovative solutions like the Water Saver showerhead to significantly reduce water use in salons.

While global industry leaders are making significant commitments and driving innovations in sustainable beauty, the challenge for Tanzania lies in ensuring these practices are adopted locally, particularly by the dominant local manufacturers. The growth of the sustainable beauty market presents an opportunity, but the prevalence of "greenwashing" necessitates robust local verification and consumer education to ensure genuine environmental impact. The fact that local manufacturers are identified as leading polluters means that the widespread adoption of these global best practices by Tanzanian companies is paramount. The current lack of specific Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) legislation in Tanzania further reduces the incentive for local companies to invest in potentially costly sustainable alternatives. For Tanzania to truly benefit from these global sustainability trends, there must be a concerted effort to localize these innovations, supported by policy incentives, consumer demand for verified sustainable products, and capacity building for local manufacturers to transition away from polluting practices.

Community and NGO Action

Local Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) and community-based initiatives in Tanzania are playing a vital role in environmental conservation and waste management. The Global Peace Foundation (GPF) Tanzania, in collaboration with local organizations, actively conducts beach cleanups and educates communities on the detrimental effects of pollution and the importance of sustainable waste management practices. The Tanzania Environmental Action Association (TEAA) focuses its efforts on pollution control, reforestation, and promoting recycling through community-driven initiatives and policy advocacy. The Jane Goodall Institute's Roots & Shoots program also engages young people in environmental conservation efforts, fostering a new generation of environmental stewards.

Several local initiatives are demonstrating practical approaches to sustainable beauty. Inaya Zanzibar, for example, produces handmade, eco-friendly, and biodegradable soaps and skincare products using pure African oils and butters, and notably operates with an all-women production team. There are also broader efforts to transform agricultural by-products, such as sisal waste, into valuable resources, with potential applications in the cosmetic industry. The New Stars Foundation empowers women by teaching them skills like making natural cosmetics, providing avenues for income generation. Zanzibar has also seen initiatives promoting beauty products derived from seaweeds, highlighting the potential of local, natural resources.

Local NGOs and community-based initiatives in Tanzania offer a crucial grassroots approach to addressing cosmetic pollution, particularly through direct waste management, environmental education, and fostering sustainable livelihoods. These efforts, often centered on natural ingredients and traditional practices, provide a counter-narrative and practical alternatives to the polluting practices of the mainstream industry, demonstrating that sustainable beauty is achievable locally. These initiatives frequently operate at the community level, directly mitigating the impact of pollution and empowering local populations. They also highlight the potential of utilizing local, natural resources, such as sisal and seaweed, as sustainable alternatives to conventional ingredients. This contrasts sharply with the large-scale industrial pollution discussed earlier. The recognition that "waste collection is an opportunity and an income source" further links these environmental efforts to economic empowerment, creating a dual benefit for communities. Supporting and scaling these local, community-driven initiatives is therefore vital for building a sustainable cosmetic sector from the ground up in Tanzania, fostering both environmental stewardship and economic development, and providing a model for responsible consumption and production that aligns with local values.

The Circular Economy: A Path Forward for Tanzania's Cosmetics

The adoption of circular economy principles offers a transformative pathway for Tanzania to address its severe cosmetic pollution challenges by reframing waste as an economic resource. This model emphasizes reusing, repairing, refurbishing, and recycling materials to extend product life and minimize waste, fundamentally challenging the linear "take-make-dispose" approach.

In Tanzania, there is significant potential for waste valorization, which involves converting waste materials into valuable products such as energy, chemicals, and raw materials. For example, sisal by-products, which constitute 98% of the waste from sisal fiber production, contain valuable components that can be repurposed, including for the cosmetic industry. A tangible example of this approach is PREYO CO. LTD in Dar es Salaam, which is actively transforming discarded plastic into eco-friendly and durable products like paving bricks. This demonstrates a practical application of the "waste to wealth" concept.

Achieving true sustainability and a circular economy requires concerted collaboration among all stakeholders: consumers, brands, and legislators. The establishment of the Tanzanian National Plastic Action Partnership (NPAP) in August 2024 represents a significant step in this direction. This partnership aims to bring together the government, private sector, civil society, and local communities to collaboratively create a circular economy for plastics in Tanzania.

The adoption of circular economy principles, particularly waste valorization, presents a transformative opportunity for Tanzania to address its severe cosmetic pollution challenges by turning waste into economic value. This approach directly tackles the country's low recycling rates and lack of proper disposal infrastructure by reframing waste as a resource. This fosters new industries and creates jobs, as seen with the potential for sisal by-products in cosmetics and the work of companies like PREYO CO. LTD. The emphasis on creating "new industries, job opportunities and reducing environmental impact" highlights the multi-faceted benefits beyond just pollution control. The formation of the NPAP indicates government recognition and a multi-stakeholder commitment to this approach, signaling a shift towards a more integrated and sustainable waste management strategy. A circular economy model offers a systemic, long-term solution that moves beyond simply managing waste to preventing its generation, creating economic opportunities, and fostering a more sustainable industrial ecosystem in Tanzania, which is particularly critical given the current infrastructure deficits.

Recommendations for a Sustainable Tanzanian Cosmetic Industry

Transforming Tanzania's cosmetic industry towards sustainability requires a concerted and multi-pronged approach involving policy, industry, and consumer action.

Policy Recommendations

• Strengthening Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR): Tanzania should implement specific, legally binding EPR legislation for cosmetic manufacturers, moving beyond the current reliance on guidelines. This legislation would mandate producers to take financial and operational responsibility for the collection, recycling, and safe disposal of their product packaging and post-consumer waste.

• Improving Waste Management Infrastructure: Increased investment is crucial for developing modern waste collection, sorting, and processing facilities, including sanitary landfills and recycling plants, particularly in rapidly urbanizing areas. Furthermore, supporting and formalizing the informal waste picking sector is essential, recognizing their critical role in waste recovery.

• Stricter Enforcement and Monitoring: The capacity of regulatory bodies such as TFDA/TMDA, NEMC, and TBS must be enhanced to effectively monitor and enforce existing regulations. This is particularly vital for controlling imported products, addressing unregistered businesses, and combating counterfeit cosmetics. Streamlining regulatory processes can reduce unnecessary burdens on compliant businesses while simultaneously increasing penalties for non-compliance to act as a stronger deterrent.

• Reviewing Plastic Bag Exemptions: The current exemption for ziplock bags used for toiletries in the plastic bag ban should be re-evaluated. This review is necessary to prevent unintended plastic waste leakage from cosmetic products that are brought into the country under this provision.

• Promoting Circular Economy Policies: The government should develop policies and incentives that actively encourage waste valorization, industrial symbiosis, and the increased use of recycled content in new products. Such measures would foster a robust circular economy within the cosmetic sector.

Industry Recommendations

• Adopting Circular Economy Principles: Both local and international cosmetic brands operating in Tanzania should proactively adopt circular design principles. This includes a strong focus on reusable, refillable, and recyclable packaging, and exploring innovative materials such as biodegradable plastics or solid product formulations.

• Investing in Sustainable R&D: The industry should prioritize research and development into microplastic-free formulations, water-saving technologies in manufacturing, and the expanded use of local, sustainably sourced natural ingredients.

• Transparent Reporting and Greenwashing Avoidance: Brands must commit to full transparency regarding their ingredients, sourcing practices, and environmental impact data. This information should be verified by independent third-party testing to build consumer trust and effectively combat misleading "greenwashing" claims.

• Collaborating on Waste Management: Cosmetic companies should actively engage in multi-stakeholder partnerships, such as the National Plastic Action Partnership , and support Extended Producer Responsibility initiatives. This collaborative approach is essential for contributing to and funding improved waste collection and recycling infrastructure across Tanzania.

Consumer Recommendations

• Making Informed Choices: Consumers should educate themselves on product ingredients, packaging materials, and the authenticity of brand sustainability claims. Seeking out products with credible certifications and transparent labeling is crucial.

• Supporting Sustainable Brands: Prioritizing purchases from brands that demonstrate a genuine commitment to eco-friendly packaging, microplastic-free formulations, and ethical sourcing is vital, with a particular emphasis on supporting local brands like Inaya Zanzibar that embody these values.

• Responsible Disposal: Practicing proper waste segregation at home and actively participating in local recycling programs, where available, is essential. Consumers should also advocate for improved waste management services within their communities.

• Reducing Consumption: Considering a reduction in overall cosmetic product consumption and opting for multi-purpose or concentrated formulations can significantly minimize waste generation and water use.

Conclusion: Beauty with Responsibility

The journey towards a truly sustainable cosmetic industry in Tanzania is complex and demands a concerted effort from all stakeholders. While the industry's growth offers undeniable economic benefits, its environmental footprint, particularly stemming from plastic and chemical pollution, poses significant challenges to Tanzania's precious natural resources and the health of its population.

However, the analysis indicates that with robust policy interventions, innovative industry practices, and active engagement from consumers and communities, Tanzania has a profound opportunity to transform its beauty sector. By embracing sustainable practices and fostering a circular economy, the nation can ensure that beauty truly enhances life, without imposing an unacceptable cost on the environment. This transformation is not merely an environmental imperative but also an economic opportunity, capable of fostering new industries and creating green jobs, thereby building a more resilient and responsible future for Tanzania.

References

4ocean.com. How Cosmetics Brands Are Rethinking Packaging to Eliminate Plastic Waste. Available at: https://www.4ocean.com/blogs/blog/how-cosmetics-brands-are-rethinking-packaging-to-eliminate-plastic-waste.

4ocean.com. The Ugly Truth About Plastic Waste in the Beauty Industry. Available at: https://www.4ocean.com/blogs/blog/the-ugly-truth-about-plastic-waste-in-the-beauty-industry.

Ada Cosmetics. Microplastics in Cosmetic Products: How to Avoid "Environmentally Unfriendly" Cosmetics. Available at: https://www.ada-cosmetics.com/blog/microplastics-in-cosmetic-products.

allAfrica.com. (2022). Tanzania: TBs Bans Three Cosmetics Making Ingredients. Available at: https://allafrica.com/stories/202203240213.html.

Daily News. (2023). Govt moves to strengthen waste management. Available at: https://www.dailynews.co.tz/govt-moves-to-strengthen-waste-management/.

Environmental Management Act (EMA), 2004. Available at: https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/tan49419.pdf.

Euromonitor International. Waterless Beauty: Opportunities Beyond Compliance. Available at: https://www.euromonitor.com/article/waterless-beauty-opportunities-beyond-compliance.

Global Cosmetics News. (2022). Tanzania bans three cosmetics ingredients. Available at: https://globalcosmeticsnews.com/tanzania-bans-three-cosmetics-ingredients/.

Global Peace Foundation. Harnessing Community Power to Fight Coastal Pollution in Tanzania. Available at: https://www.globalpeace.org/news/harnessing-community-power-fight-coastal-pollution-tanzania.

The IGC. (2023). Legal and regulatory challenges and market opportunities in the cosmetics sector in Tanzania. Available at: https://www.theigc.org/blogs/legal-and-regulatory-challenges-and-market-opportunities-cosmetics-sector-tanzania.

IUCN. Tanzania National Guidance for Plastic Pollution Hotspotting Report: 29 thousand tonnes of plastic leaked to ocean, rivers and lakes in 2018. Available at: https://www.iucn.org/news/eastern-and-southern-africa/202106/tanzania-national-guidance-plastic-pollution-hotspotting-report-29-thousand-tonnes-plastic-leaked-ocean-rivers-and-lakes-2018.

Inaya Zanzibar. Inaya Zanzibar - Handmade African Soaps & Skincare. Available at: https://inayazanzibar.com/.

Lebubè. Beauty Industry's Water Footprint & Sustainable Solutions. Available at: https://lebube.com/blogs/news/beauty-industry-s-water-footprint-sustainable-solutions.

London Brow Company Blog. Understanding Cosmetic Waste: Environmental Impacts. Available at: https://londonbrowcompany.com/blogs/news/understanding-cosmetic-waste-environmental-impacts.

Lugendo, B.R., Mgaya, Y.D., Kalwani, A.M., Makwaia, K. and Mwita, N. (2020). Microplastics in Marine Sediments from Dar es Salaam Coast: Spatial Distribution and Characterization. African Journal of Aquatic Science, 45(2), pp.187-198. Available at: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajas/article/view/196307.

Maboko, S.G., Mlay, A.B., Mbarawa, H.A. and Makungu, J.A. (2019). Level of selected heavy metals in some commercially available cosmetic products in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. African Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 13(31), pp.407-414. Available at: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajpp/article/view/192257.

Maisha Huru. Natural Beauty Products in Tanzania: Harnessing Local Ingredients. Available at: https://maishahuru.com/blogs/natural-beauty-products-in-tanzania.

Nasikia Safaris. Tanzania Plastic Bag Ban: Essential Rules for Travelers. Available at: https://nasikiasafaris.com/tanzania-plastic-bag-ban-essential-rules-for-travelers/.

National Environment Management Council (NEMC). National Environment Management Council. Available at: https://eia.nemc.or.tz/.

National Plastic Action Partnership. Tanzania - National Plastic Action Partnership. Available at: https://globalplasticaction.org/tanzania/.

New Stars Foundation. Volunteer – New Stars Foundation. Available at: https://newstarsfoundation.org/volunteer/.

Nipe Fagio. (2021). Nipe Fagio | National Report 2021. Break Free From Plastic Brand Audit. Available at: https://brandaudit.breakfreefromplastic.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Tanzania-Brand-Audit-Report-2021-Nipe-Fagio.pdf.

PubMed Central. (2022). Strengthening regulation for medical products in Tanzania: An assessment of regulatory capacity development, 1978–2020. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8756306/.

Pure Earth. Tanzania - Msimbazi River Action Network. Available at: https://www.pureearth.org/project/tanzania-msimbazi-river-action-network/.

SGS Tanzania. Eco-Conscious Beauty and the Importance of Sustainability in Cosmetics. Available at: https://www.sgs.com/en-tz/news/2022/11/eco-conscious-beauty-and-the-importance-of-sustainability-in-cosmetics.

Shop Without Plastic. Microplastic in Cosmetics: The Hidden Threat (2024). Available at: https://shop-without-plastic.com/blogs/news/microplastic-in-cosmetics.

SustainabilityMEA. Tanzanian stakeholders unite in push for plastic bottle recycling. Available at: https://sustainabilitymea.com/article/tanzanian-stakeholders-unite-in-push-for-plastic-bottle-recycling.

Tanzania Bureau of Standards (TBS). DEAS 1172 Wastewater discharged on land and into water bodies Specifications. Available at: https://www.tbs.go.tz/standards/2361/DEAS%201172%20Wastewater%20discharged%20on%20land%20and%20into%20water%20bodies%20Specifications.

TDi Sustainability. Cosmetics - TDi Sustainability. Available at: https://www.tdi-sustainability.com/industry/cosmetics.

The Chanzo. Plastic Waste Pickers: The Shunned and Scorned Environmental Warriors of Tanzania. Available at: https://thechanzo.com/2023/04/24/plastic-waste-pickers-the-shunned-and-scorned-environmental-warriors-of-tanzania/.

The Tanzania Food, Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 2003. Available at: https://procedures.tic.go.tz/docs/The%20Tanzania%20Food,%20Drugs%20and%20Cosmetics%20Act,%202003.pdf.

TMDA. (2015). The Tanzania Food, Drugs And Cosmetics (Recall, Handling And Disposal Of Unfit Medicines And Cosmetics) Regulations, 2015. Available at: https://www.tmda.go.tz/uploads/The_Tanzania_Food_Drugs_And_Cosmetics_Recall_Handling_And_Disposal_Of_Unfit_Medicines_And_Cosmetics_Regulations_2015_1_THE.pdf.

Unilever. Unilever supports cosmetics industry to take action on sustainability. Available at: https://www.unilever.com/news/news-and-features/news-releases/2020/unilever-supports-cosmetics-industry-to-take-action-on-sustainability/.

Zawya. (2025). L'Oréal Groupe showcases AI-driven and sustainable beauty tech innovations at LEAP 2025 in Saudi Arabia. Available at: https://www.zawya.com/en/press-release/companies-news/loreal-groupe-showcases-ai-driven-and-sustainable-beauty-tech-innovations-at-leap-2025-in-saudi-arabia-f28m9b4g.